For the record, the Wall Street Journal disagrees with my view that the recent "enemy combatant" ruling was correct, and they believe it will be overturned:

see "Al Qaeda's American Harbor"
A bad decision likely to be overturned.
Opinion Journal, June 14, 2007

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010207

2 comments

# The Freak on 06/14/07 at 10:48

The WSG essentially argues that we should trust the executive branch as they arrest people (and there's no restriction against the same treatment being extended to American citizens) in the country. Just because the executive says they are enemy combatants, does not mean they are; that's what trials are for.

All the judges said is that the guy's got right to a trial. I don't buy the argument about national security -- there are ways to protect evidence (like, not disclosing it to congress). So give him a trial. If he's guilty, throw away the key.

I actually don't believe the judges are wrong. The president can't arbitrarily suspend constitutional protections. I think this will make for an interesting case on appeal.

# Rossputin [Member] Email on 06/14/07 at 10:54
Freak, as you know from my original article, you and I agree on this, to the dismay of some of my more "conservative" readers.

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)

Politics, economics, current events, philosophy and more, with an emphasis on free minds, free markets, and free people.

August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Search

Blogroll

XML Feeds

Contents

powered by b2evolution free blog software