Yesterday's letter from Don Boudreaux to the Wall Street Journal is simply too good not to reprint here: 30 December 2005 Editor, The Wall Street Journal 200 Liberty Street New York, NY 10281 Dear Editor: While Thomas Stossel magnificently punctures the pretentiousness of medical journals ("Mere Magazines," Dec. 30), a further point must be made: researchers, physicians, and the news media increasingly but wrongly treat scientific findings as prescriptions for how people should live. Even the most unassailable scientific truths do not, and should not, alone determine people's preferences and choices. For example, no scientific researcher can determine if the pleasure Mr. Smith enjoys from smoking cigarettes is greater or less than the costs he suffers from lower life expectancy. Science can tell us only the likely consequences of our actions; it cannot tell us how to evaluate and weigh these consequences. Sincerely, Donald J. Boudreaux Chairman, Department of Economics George Mason University Fairfax, VA 22030

No feedback yet

I Am John Galt
Politics, economics, current events, philosophy and more, with a focus on free minds, free markets, and free people.

Following Obama's Economic Policies

Following Obama
September 2015
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

  XML Feeds

powered by b2evolution