PUBLISHED in the Denver Post, 3/10/05,1413,36%257E416%257E,00.html Re: CU weighs buyout for firebrand prof (Denver Post, March 8, 2005) To the Editors: A buyout of Ward Churchill is a terrible idea for many reasons. First, the case against Churchill is much too strong for the University to be afraid of losing in court. Second, it sets a terrible precedent. Future bad behavior and violation of contract will become exceptionally difficult to punish. Would a professor who is even more destructive than Churchill simply be worth a bigger payout? Third, the University of Colorado is a public institution and has a fiduciary responsibility to taxpayers including not paying the equivalent of protection money to a terrorist. If a buyout is offered, citizens should take every possible legal action to block it. If the University is worried about the cost of defending themselves in a lawsuit, put me down for a $1000 contribution to a legal defense fund for any regent with the courage to stand up and fire Ward Churchill.


# Luis Landau on 03/09/05 at 00:46
I like your proposal. Thanks for your generous offer to help finance the legal costs of defending a decison to fire this sick person.
# Brad Warbiany on 03/09/05 at 05:00
Wow. If that's not the dumbest thing I've heard in a long time. The buyout won't work, for the following reason: Churchill will refuse. He knows he won't be offered another tenured teaching job if he gives up CU, and will be able to claim the moral victory of sticking a thumb in the eye of the administration trying to silence him. It's just bad PR, because there is no way he'd accept it.
I Am John Galt
Politics, economics, current events, philosophy and more, with a focus on free minds, free markets, and free people.

Following Obama's Economic Policies

Following Obama
September 2015
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

  XML Feeds

powered by b2evolution